Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    Default Brain death study case pictures - NEURORADIOLOGY ATLAS

    Brain Death:
    Assessment, Controversy,
    and Confounding Factors

    When brain injury is refractory to aggressive management and is considered nonsurvivable, with loss of consciousness and brain stem reflexes, a brain death protocol may be initiated to determine death according to
    neurological criteria. Clinical evaluation typically entails 2 consecutive formal neurological examinations to
    document total loss of consciousness and absence of brain stem reflexes and then apnea testing to evaluate
    carbon dioxide unresponsiveness within the brain stem. Confounding factors such as use of therapeutic hypothermia, high-dose metabolic suppression, and movements associated with complex spinal reflexes, fasciculations,
    or cardiogenic ventilator autotriggering may delay initiation or completion of brain death protocols. Neuro -
    diagnostic studies such as 4-vessel cerebral angiography can rapidly document absence of blood flow to the
    brain and decrease intervals between onset of terminal brain stem herniation and formal declaration of death
    by neurological criteria. Intracranial pathophysiology leading to brain death must be considered along with clinical assessment, patterns of vital signs, and relevant diagnostic studies.

    Determination of death according to neurological criteria has far-reaching implications.
    Heart-beating, brain-dead donors provide the majority of organs for transplant.
    1Extended
    times between terminal brain stem herniation, declaration of brain death, and organ recovery
    risk loss of organs because of refractory cardiopulmonary instability.
    Brain death study case pictures attachment.php?s=b37737d2d0081322e519138997a95f51&attachmentid=1522&d=1440248356
    A second implication is the cost
    of intensive care, potentially exceeding $5000 daily.

    Recognizing terminal brain stem herniation and
    earlier declaration of brain death may help avoid costs associated with futile care. Last, patients who
    have had terminal brain stem herniation and who are medically unsuitable for organ donation may no
    longer benefit from intensive care.

    Delay in determining brain death may add to the stress a patient’s
    family experiences in keeping a vigil for a loved one without a chance of recovery.

    From brain injury
    through progression of intracranial pathophysiological changes, promoting recovery is the goal. With
    refractory injury and final brain stem herniation, a brain death protocol is appropriate.
    The concept of brain death dates to 1959 with the introduction of “coma dépassé,” a state beyond
    coma indicating loss of life functions such as reflexes, consciousness, and mobility. In 1968 the Harvard

    Pathophysiology of Brain Injury
    Terminal brain stem herniation is often the final stage
    in refractory brain injury caused by trauma, ischemia or
    infarction, hemorrhage, intracranial tumors, and infectious processes such as encephalitis and meningitis.
    Anoxic or ischemic injury after cardiopulmonary arrest
    can initiate neuronal death and lead to terminal brain
    stem dysfunction.
    Brain death study case pictures attachment.php?s=b37737d2d0081322e519138997a95f51&attachmentid=1521&d=1440248313
    Montoring, Interventions, and Family Care
    Goals of frequent, dynamic neurological assessments
    of patients with brain injury include identifying injury
    progression, detecting stabilized neurological status or
    response to therapy, and rapidly determining and acting
    on opportunities for intervention before brain herniation
    syndromes occur. Patient advocacy and vigilance are vital
    to identify and aggressively treat consequences of injury
    to other body systems at the earliest opportunity. When
    evolving consequences of brain injury are identified,
    patient advocacy may take the form of prioritizing aggressive, mechanism-based care in treating intracranial
    pathophysiology. Advocacy, honesty, and the development of trust between a patient’s family and personnel
    on the health care team markedly promote communication and rapport during a stressful and difficult time for
    the family. Family members of a patient with a devastating brain injury are under stress

    and need empathy,
    teaching, and an environment of trust. Nurses are pivotal
    to establish trust and help the family understand the torrent of information from multiple health care providers.
    Taking time and building on the trust established upon
    ICU admission can help the family understand brain
    injury, progression of the injury, and what brain death
    means. All these considerations are vital with or without
    organ recovery and transplantation as possible end points.



    References
    http://www.aacn.org/wd/Cetests/media/C1362.pdf











    Last edited by Medical Photos; 08-22-2015 at 12:59 PM.

  2. Similar Threads

    1. Lymphoma case pictures - NEURORADIOLOGY ATLAS
      By Medical Videos in forum Neurology Atlas(Photos of cases)
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 02-15-2009, 10:10 AM
    2. Brain abcess case pictures - NEURORADIOLOGY ATLAS
      By Medical Videos in forum Neurology Atlas(Photos of cases)
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 02-15-2009, 09:39 AM
    3. Calcification of basal ganglia case pictures - NEURORADIOLOGY ATLAS
      By Medical Videos in forum Neurology Atlas(Photos of cases)
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 02-14-2009, 11:15 AM
    4. SAH case pictures - NEURORADIOLOGY ATLAS
      By Medical Videos in forum Neurology Atlas(Photos of cases)
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 02-14-2009, 10:55 AM
    5. Thrombus in torcula of venous sinuses case pictures - NEURORADIOLOGY ATLAS
      By Medical Videos in forum Neurology Atlas(Photos of cases)
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 02-14-2009, 10:47 AM
  3. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    9
    Country

    Country

    Occupation
    doctor

    Default

    thank youuuuuuuuu

  4. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    3
    Country

    Country

    Occupation
    Consultant

    Default

    Brain-specific or lipophilic tracers which cross the blood-brain barrier (eg, Tc-99m HMPAO or Tc-99m ECD) are preferred over non-specific or lipophobic tracers (eg,Tc-99m DTPA), which are considered angiographic radionuclides.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Medical Educational Site for Medical Students and Doctors Contains Free Medical Videos ,Atlases,Books,Drug Index ,Researches ,Health and Medical Technology news.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Join us
    Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2015
  • vBulletin®
  • Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. vBulletin Metro Theme by
  • PixelGoose Studio