Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Congenital Pit of the Cymba Conchae pictures - Ear Atlas

  1. #1

    Default Congenital Pit of the Cymba Conchae pictures - Ear Atlas

    Preauricular sinuses were first described by Heusinger in 1864 . They are congenital malformations that result from defective or incomplete fusion of the six auricular hillocks . They are more frequent in Taiwan 1.6% - 2.5% and some areas of Africa 4% - 10% and less frequent in United States 0.1% - 0.9% and England 0.9% . One third of the patients remain asymptomatic and require no treatment . However, once a preauricular sinus becomes infected, its excision is mandatory.Postauricular abscesses can result from infected epidermoid cysts or rarely type I anomalies of the first branchial cleft . The differential diagnosis includes inflamed adenopathy mastoiditis and subperiosteal abcesses although in the latter two cases auditory and vestibular symptoms usually coexist .We present the case of one patient that had recurrent postauricular abscesses for which he was operated seven times by different surgeons. Finally, thorough clinical examination revealed a preauricular pit. The combined excision of the preauricular sinus and the remnants of the postauricular cyst resolved the problem and the patient has been asymptomatic ever since during our two years follow-up.

    Case Report
    A 13 year-old boy presented to the outpatients department with an infected cystic lesion and a hypertrophic scar below the left earlobe (Figure 1).A review of his medical history revealed recurrent infections of this area approximately every two months since he was 5 years old. The patient was operated seven times in the past for excision of the cystic lesion by two Head and Neck surgeons and two Plastic Surgeons. The biopsies of the initial operations revealed trichilemmal cysts, and the biopsies of the two last operations features in keeping with a hypertrophic scar and ruptured epidermal cyst. In between operations, the patient had recurrent infections and was treated conservatively with antibiotics and in three cases with incision and drainage. He was also referred to the dermatologists for an area < 1 cm in diameter below the left earlobe with oozing and yellowish crusts that was considered to be seborrheic dermatitis.Careful clinical examination revealed a preauricular pit slightly anterior to the intertragal notch (Figure 2). A sinogram was requested but failed because the radiologist was unable to cannulate the sinus. A subsequent CT and MRI scan demonstrated no definite extension of the sinus much beneath the subcutaneous tissues, and that a plane existed between the postauricular cyst and the adjacent parotid gland.During the operation, methylene blue injection (Figure 3) into the preauricular sinus rapidly filled the postauricular sinus and confirmed continuity between them. The entire area was carefully dissected under loupe magnification and a wedge of tragal cartilage was excised to reveal a 1 cm preauricular epithelialised debris
    Congenital Cymba Conchae pictures Atlas attachment.php?s=416aa617a438afafd8be2d4e1ce64a8c&attachmentid=1872&d=1441392580

    filled sinus cavity. The specimen was excised en block including the wedge of tragal cartilage. The histology report proved excision of inflamed preand postauricular sinus with attached keloid scar.A wedge of tragal cartilage was also excised to ensure removal of the tract’s attachments to the perichondrium. The patient has been asymptomatic since the operation and has no nuisances apart from a hypertrophic scar during our two year follow up (Figure 4).

    The external ear develops from six mesenchymal prolixferations (hillocks): three from the caudal edge of the 1st branchial arch and another three from the cephalic edge of the 2nd branchial arch. The tragus and the anterior crus of the helix margin develop from the 1st arch, and the rest of the auricle is formed from the 2nd arch .The three predominant theories for the development of preauricular sinuses are: 1) Possible incomplete fusion of the 1st arch hillocks; 2) Isolation of ectodermal folds during auricle formation; and 3) Defective closure of the most dorsal part of the first branchial cleft.Preauricular sinuses and anomalies of the first branchial cleft can have similar presentations. Preauricular sinuses usually present with an opening anterior to the ascending limb of the helix. Occasionally, they occur along the lateral or posterior surface of the helicine crus and the superior posterior margin of the helix, the tragus, or the lobule . First branchial cleft anomalies
    can present as a cyst or sinus within the ear canal or postauricular area, whilst an opening in the cheek, below the angle of the mandible, or upper neck above the hyoid bone, suggests a type II anomaly . In the current case, a postauricular cyst was present. However, an opening in the canal was not observed, nor was the course of the tract parallel to the canal. These data suggested that the lesion was a preauricular sinus instead of a branchial cleft type I anomaly .Preauricular sinuses presenting as postauricular inflammation have rarely been reported. Chang and Wu reported three cases presenting as postauricular cysts and Yeo et al. reported 2 cases where the pit was located in the postauricular area in a total of 191 patients [. Choi et al. presented a series of 101 patients of which 11 cases with the variant type . They classified the variant types of preauricular sinuses into three categories according to the location of pits: In type 1 the pits were located on the middle area of the crus, in type 2 they were located on the superior area of the crus, and in type 3 on the cymba concha. The present case however, does not fall into any of the aforementioned categories, as the sinus was slightly anterior to the intertragal notch.If the components of the preauricular sinus are not completely excised recurrence is likely. Therefore, methylene blue injection was used to outline the tracts and the operation was performed under loupe magnification

    The purpose of the pinna is to collect sound. It does so by acting as a funnel, amplifying the sound and directing it to the ear canal. While reflecting from the pinna, sound also goes through a filtering process which adds directional information to the sound (see sound localization, head-related transfer function, pinna notch). The filtering effect of the human pinna preferentially selects sounds in the frequency range of human speech.

    Amplification of sound by the pinna, tympanic membrane and middle ear causes an increase in level of about 10 to 15 dB in a frequency range of 1.5 kHz to 7 kHz. This amplification is an important factor in inner ear trauma resulting from elevated sound levels.
    Congenital Cymba Conchae pictures Atlas attachment.php?s=416aa617a438afafd8be2d4e1ce64a8c&attachmentid=1873&d=1441392597

    Pinna Notch
    The pinna works differently for low and high frequency sounds. For low frequencies, it behaves similarly to a reflector dish, directing sounds toward the ear canal. For high frequencies, however, its value is more sophisticatedly reckoned. While some of the sounds that enter the ear travel directly to the canal, others reflect off the contours of the pinna first: these enter the ear canal at a very slight delay. Such a delay translates into phase cancellation, where the frequency component whose wave period is twice the delay period is virtually eliminated. Neighboring frequencies are dropped significantly. This is known as the pinna notch, where the pinna creates a notch filtering effect.

    The developing Pinna is first noticeable around the sixth week of gestation in the human foetus, developing from six rounded protuberances (the six hillocks of Hiss) which are derived from the first and second branchial arches. These hillocks develop into the folds of the pinna and gradually shift upwards and backwards to their final position on the head. En-route accessory auricles (also known as preauricular tags - see below) may be left behind. The first three Hillocks are dervied from the 1st branchial arch and form the tragus, crus of the helix and helix respectively. Cutaneous sensation to these areas is via the trigeminal nerve, the attendant nerve of the 1st branchial arch. The final three Hillockes are derived from the 2nd branchial arch and form the antihelix, antitragus and lobule respectively. These portions of the ear are supplied by the cervical plexus and a small portion by the facial nerve. This explains why vesicles are classically seen on the Pinna in Herpes infection of the facial nerve ( Ramsay-Hunt Syndrome)

    Pinna - wikidoc
    Uncommon Presentation of a Preauricular Sinus

    Last edited by Medical Photos; 09-04-2015 at 06:49 PM.

  2. Similar Threads

    1. Pictures of Congenital Ear Deformities pictures - Ear Atlas
      By Medical Videos in forum E.N.T Atlas(Photos of cases)
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 02-28-2009, 09:00 AM
    2. Congenital keratotic cyst Dentistry Case pictures - Oral Pathology Atlas
      By Medical Videos in forum Dentistry and Oral Health Atlas(Photos of cases)
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 02-25-2009, 10:48 AM
    3. Congenital Epulis Dentistry Case pictures - Oral Pathology Atlas
      By Medical Videos in forum Dentistry and Oral Health Atlas(Photos of cases)
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 02-25-2009, 10:47 AM
    4. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Pictures - Pediatric cases
      By Medical Videos in forum Pediatrics Atlas(Photos of cases)
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 01-23-2009, 08:07 AM

Tags for this Thread



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
About us
Medical Educational Site for Medical Students and Doctors Contains Free Medical Videos ,Atlases,Books,Drug Index ,Researches ,Health and Medical Technology news.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Join us
    Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2015
  • vBulletin®
  • Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. vBulletin Metro Theme by
  • PixelGoose Studio